India’s ban on electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) such as e-cigarettes has robbed the country’s 120 million smokers of access to less harmful alternatives, a tobacco harm reduction advocate said at an online global forum on June 11.
got me to wonder why a country which would benefit the most from risk reduction
so hastily ban it? Why didn’t the government think that a million Indian lives
lost every year to smoking were worth saving?” Association of Vapers India
(AVI) director Samrat Chowdhery said during the virtual Global Forum on
traditionally held in Warsaw, Poland, is an annual conference organised by London-based
Knowledge Action Change to discuss the merits of tobacco harm reduction. Nearly
600 individuals participated in this year’s forum held online on June 11 and 12
which delivered presentations from 30 experts on the theme “Nicotine: science,
ethics and human rights”.
talked about the challenges to tobacco harm reduction posed by policy, state
control and tobacco monopolies and slammed the decision of the government to
ban ENDS, which he said could be blamed on various factors, including the
influential tobacco industry in the country.
the lucrativeness of tobacco trade and the amount of tax revenue it generates,
the state has always historically owned and operated this business. While the
western nations ceded control over the last century, many low- and
middle-income countries (LMICs), especially in Latin America and Asia, continue
to partially or wholly-own tobacco companies,” said Chowdhery.
said this resulted in serious implications such as conflict of interest, which
raises questions about the state’s intent in reducing use of tobacco products
when it directly profits from their sale.
tobacco companies behave like public sector units, which although also driven
by profit just like the private sector, are notoriously resistant to change.
They see innovation as a threat and have the political means to stub it out to
maintain the status quo. This effect is manifest in the ongoing pushbacks
against risk-reduction technologies in many Latin American and Asian nations,
including India where the state owns nearly a third of the country’s cigarette
monopoly,” Chowdhery said.
said to resolve the smoking epidemic, the state should divest from the tobacco
industry. “Removing benefits to the state from tobacco should in fact go
further, by ensuring that sin tax is used only to reduce the sin and for
controlling damage from it, and for no other purpose.
would force a rethink of the problem, framing it in ways that actually help the
world’s 1 billion tobacco users and removes incentives for strategies that do
little to improve their lives or conditions while further alienating and
punishing them,” he said.
80 percent of the world’s smokers live in LMICs such as India. Globally,
experts say the smoking epidemic, the single biggest cause of non-communicable
disease, could kill 8 million people in 2020.